SYLLABUS
(All this Internet stuff,
is it really worth it?)
3 semester hours graduate
credit
Description:
This hands-on class will provide numerous online examples of how to integrate the Internet into all K-12 curriculums. This online class will help teachers find and use educational resources on the Internet.
Overview:
The purpose of this course is to allow elementary and secondary teachers to explore and develop engaging online projects as well as demonstrate how teachers can become facilitators in their classrooms. Internet-based activities will include collaborative problem solving, information collections, and interpersonal exchanges. Through the use of Internet-based projects, teachers will be able to improve classroom instruction, keep students on task, and tap into the vast informational resources that exist on the Internet. Guided practice will allow the beginner, as well as the seasoned veteran, opportunities to add fun and exciting lessons for their students.
Objectives:
Upon completion of the course students will be able to:
Review and evaluate information from the Internet for use in the classroom .Identify network activities and categorize them into three structure genres
Use at least one of the structure genres to develop an interactive activity that can be posted on the Internet and used in the classroom
Develop a list of online curriculum resources to be used in the classroom .Operate the basic web-publishing features of a web editor
Develop a list of ready to use Internet resources for their classrooms
Teaching Methods/Class Format:
A hands-on collaborative approach with the instructor "coaching" will be the prime method of instruction. Brief lectures and group discussions will be utilized to explore new concepts. Students will be actively online. No simulations will be used.
Students will be divided into groups and will then evaluate a list of web sites related to each of the following structured genre: Collaborative problem solving, information collections, and interpersonal exchanges. Students will then report each group's findings to the entire class.
Review of Literature & Readings:
“Opportunities in Work Clothes." Online Problem-Solving
Project Structures April, 1994
http://lrs.ed.uiuc.edu/Mining/April94-TCT.html
“Creating a New Culture of
Teaching and Learning”
http://www.anovember.com/default.aspx?tabid=159&type=art&site=18&parentid=18
http://lrs.ed.uiuc.edu/Minin a 95-TCT/html
Educational Telecomputing Activities: Problem-solving Projects May, 1995
"Mining the Internet" column, Learning: and Leading: with Technology by Judi Harris
Textbook:
Harris, Judy. Virtual Architecture: Designing and Directing Curriculum-Based Telecomputing, International Society of Technology in Education. 1998. ISBN: 1564841308
Units of Work:
Day One:
· Introduction and informal current assessment of students/teachers
· Goals and expectations
· Introduction of interpersonal exchanges genre
· Activities and assessments regarding interpersonal exchanges only
Day Two:
· Review previous day's genre: interpersonal exchanges
· Introduction of information collection activity structures and examples.
· Activities and assessments regarding information collection genre
· Explore web pages for information collection genre only
Day Three:
· Review previous day's genre: information collection.
· Problem-solving activity structures and examples
· Develop on-going list of attributes of education telecomputing projects.
· Activities and assessments regarding problem-solving genre.
· Explore web pages for problem-solving genre only.
· Introduce suggestions for outcome project designs
· Introduce web-publishing features of Netscape Composer or similar web editor
Day Four:
· Putting it all together (review all activity structures, design processes, etc.).
· Discussion of assigned articles (authored by Judi Harris)
· Work in grade level or content area and/or thematic area groups to develop specific projects
Day Five:
·
Collaboratively review attributes of educational
telecomputing projects.
·
Aspects of engaged learning http://www.ncrel.org
· Build notions and plans for assessment of student learning.
· Complete projects
· Share projects with entire group and offer to post on website and or archive to removable storage.
· Final exam
Class Resources:
Harris,
Judy. Way of the Ferret: Finding and Using Educational Resources on the
Internet. 2nd edition. International Society of Technology in Education. 1995.
Global Schoolhouse.
"The Well-Connected Educator. http://www.gsh.org/
Adventure
Online. Project Collections. http://adventureonline.com/
Class Assignments:
Assignments will be given by instructor to reinforce the units of work. Each student will be responsible for completing an independent project, which will enhance his/her classroom curriculum. Projects will be presented to the class, and also presented in written form to be shared with the class. Each student/group will be responsible for the completion of an online project that can be used in their curriculums. All projects will be reviewed and shared with the class at the end of the course. Teachers will be able to post their projects on the Internet so they become available to others. All readings will require a written summary and discussion.
Attendance:
Students are required to attend all classes and to participate in class discussions, small group activities, experimental and experiential group exercises and projects. Attendance is divided into two sessions per day, one in the morning and one in the afternoon, for each of five days. Students must attend all sessions. If absence is due to a family emergency, an attempt will be made to make up the session at a later time, if possible.
Academic Honesty and Integrity:
Students
are expected to maintain academic honesty and integrity as students at
Final Examination Policy:
A final, culminating activity is required in all off-campus courses. Each student will be responsible for completing an independent project, which will enhance his/her classroom (i.e. technique, curriculum, technology use). Each project shall be presented in disk form at the end of the course and shared verbally with the class.
Evaluation:
Grading will be based on the quality of work with components weighted as follows. Grades are differentiated on the basis of quality. Quantity alone is not a significant factor for grade differentiation.
|
30% |
60 points |
Performance of hands on activities provided by instructor |
|
30% |
60 points |
Completion of class assignments |
|
20% |
40 points |
Independent project (can be project associated with individual teacher's classroom or one assigned by instructor) |
|
20% |
40 points |
Final examination (application problem) |
|
|
200 Total Points |
|
|
Grade |
Percentile |
Points |
|
A |
100-91% |
200-182 |
|
B |
90-81% |
181-162 |
|
C |
80-71% |
161-123 |
|
F |
70-0% |
122-0 |
|
An "A" student will: |
A "B"
student will: |
A "C" student
will: |
An "F"
student will: |
|
be a prompt and regular attendant; |
be a prompt and regular attendant; |
be a prompt and regular attendant; |
be irregular in attendance and show a pattern of (unexcused) tardiness; |
|
participate actively and regularly in group work by offering ideas and asking questions; |
participate actively and regularly in group work by offering ideas and asking questions; |
generally participate in group work by offering ideas and asking questions; |
rarely participate in group work by offering ideas and asking questions; |
|
listen respectfully when others talk, both in groups and in class; |
listen when others talk, both in groups and in class; |
listen when others talk, both in groups and in class; |
not listen when others talk, both in groups and in class; disrupts the class with private conversations; |
|
offer thoughtful comments in draft workshops and on critique sheets, and is able to articulate constructive criticism as needed; |
offer thoughtful comments in draft workshops and on critique sheets, and is able to articulate constructive criticism as needed; |
offer thoughtful comments in draft workshops and on critique sheets, and makes an effort to articulate constructive criticism as needed; |
offer minimal comments in draft workshops and on critique sheets, and makes little effort to articulate constructive criticism; |
|
participate actively and regularly in class discussion; |
participate actively and regularly in class discussion; |
participate regularly in class discussion; |
not participate regularly in class discussion; |
|
completes all work assigned and projects- work clearly shows mastery of software |
completes all work assigned and projects - all projects are well done, however mastery of one project is not clearly demonstrated |
completes all work assigned and projects- work is not well written or does not show mastery of software |
missing work assigned and projects |
|
final project is complete and adaptable to content area -- shows mastery of software |
final project is complete, but lacks adaptability -- mastery of software is not clearly demonstrated |
final project is complete, but not well written or does not show master of software |
final project is missing |
American
Disability Act Compliance:
In compliance with